Balance in the Administration of Justice and Security Integrative Research Paper

Balance in the Administration of Justice and Security Integrative - Research Paper Example In essence, due to the dire situation in the organization of justice a lot of stigma is exerted on criminals and they are separated from ordinary inhabitants thus denying them their fundamental rights. Additionally, criminals are exposed to cruel conditions and given very barbaric penalties like capital punishment. However, the progression of evenhandedness and protection has brought good tidings for offenders and general residents in the sense that it provides for a tight balancing act linking justice and security. Such a concept guarantees the equal rights of all in society and creates a viable ambience for the achievement of justice. Much of the development of security and justice occurred in the course of the 21st century mostly due to the novel technology along with regulations enabling nations to create fresh types of retributions in the process of advancing justice. The outcomes of this evolution are evident as more liberties have been included in constitutions with the endeav or of establishing balance. The ratification of constitution by the authority has been engineered by the need to offer justice along with security to its citizens. A number of parameters pertain to the legal atmosphere where constitution as well as justice thrives. These parameters comprise of authority, punitive measures, mutual understanding in addition to fairness. Moreover, there are matters that pertain to the liberties of citizens along with security and the sustenance of order (Barreneche, 2006). They comprise of intrusion with liberties of as enshrined in the law. Dynamics like mass media along with technology have facilitated the delivery of security and justice to the nation. There has been an unprecedented evolution of fairness with safety in the 21st century facilitated by the establishment of novel policies to boost security in the country along with the guarantee of justice. As a result, majority of the nations have enacted legislations that conceptualize the manner in which matters of crime are dealt with. Such stipulations have been central in the quest for impartiality in addition to safety in the nation making it possible to establish a balance between the two primary parameters. Therefore, the evolution of security along with justice has been good news not only to the criminal justice system but also to the twin dynamics of security and justice which occupy a central position in the vast criminal justice system. Subsequently, surveillance has been beefed up to address activities of crime in several nations. A perfect example is the ratification of an anti terror act by America to assist in thwarting instances of crime. The primary intention of the legislation is the guarantee of security to the country’s citizens (Kelly et al, 2004). Among the many dynamics of the law include the guarantee of safety via security measures at airports and boundaries and seizure among others. The central pillar is the noninterference with the rights and liberties of citizens in the process of maintaining security. Therefore, the process of providing security and guaranteeing order should not in any way compromise the liberties and freedoms of citizens. As a result, even offenders have their rights which must not be denied. Law enforcement officers and other security agents are supposed to esteem the liberties of citizens as exemplified in the constitution. Every operation and activity must be guided by the law. However,

Argument essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words - 2

Argument - Essay Example Censorship discourages economic growth by hindering business development; this has a vast negative impact. This is evident when considering the number of the movies that are being banned or scrapped off due to the sole decision of an individual that the contents of the movies are said to be unfit for public viewing. This is not in order in spite of the fact that individuals may at times be dismissive of it terming it as protection (Reichman 66). The role of film classification officers is thus put into question as it is unclear why a committee is left to determine what films are watchable and which are not despite the clear fact that it is the regulators who place the age restrictions quite higher than they should actually, creating a negative impact on the business personalities. Information is power and a population that is empowered is better off than that which is denied information. This impact was seen in Ireland for example in the year 2000 on the film called, ‘The cider house rules,’ a movie which was given an over 18 certificate proclaiming that the information that it presented on abortion and incest was wrong. In issuing such restrictions, they argue that any individual who wants to have access to such a film must first possess an idea of the film contents and the message passed (Caso 172). This may be correct but the younger population should access the message communicated by the film especially with the onset of technological growth coupled with the fact that technology is and will continue to be a major pillar of economic growth. Therefore, many businesses are adversely affected when restrictions in terms of laws and regulations are put in place in such an environment (Lederer and Richard 312). In addition, censorship denies individuals their freedom of expression and access to information, since it is beneficial for one to be able to make well-informed decisions, but it is discouraging when some sectors within the society influence, and place restrictions on individuals to shape the values of the society members in terms of what they should do or not do. It is only possible to make clear and well-informed decisions when the individuals have all the necessary information to make such decisions. This is what censorship denies the population, the chance to make their own independent and well-informed choices by influencing their decisions and choices in a direction of their preference (Lederer and Richard 72). However, the fact that people should be allowed to make their own decisions does not mean the same people will invest their efforts in acts that would go against the norms of the society. The regulations placed have resulted into situations whereby individuals are not able to make critical decisions like those that involve the choice of curriculums in schools. This inability is attributed to inappropriate information that has made it extremely difficult for the school going personalities to be in the positi on of choosing extra curriculum activities and relevant collegial groups than they were able to before. Therefore, censorship should be discouraged since it even cuts